Dumb as We Wanna Be
By THOMAS L. FRIEDMAN
September 20, 2006

We’d rather power anti-Americans with our energy purchases than promote antipoverty.

São Paulo, Brazil

I asked Dr. José Goldemberg, secretary for the environment for São Paulo State and a pioneer of Brazil’s ethanol industry, the obvious question: Is the fact that the U.S. has imposed a 54-cents-a-gallon tariff to prevent Americans from importing sugar ethanol from Brazil “just stupid or really stupid.”

Thanks to pressure from Midwest farmers and agribusinesses, who want to protect the U.S. corn ethanol industry from competition from Brazilian sugar ethanol, we have imposed a stiff tariff to keep it out. We do this even though Brazilian sugar ethanol provides eight times the energy of the fossil fuel used to make it, while American corn ethanol provides only 1.3 times the energy of the fossil fuel used to make it. We do this even though sugar ethanol reduces greenhouses gases more than corn ethanol. And we do this even though sugar cane ethanol can easily be grown in poor tropical countries in Africa or the Caribbean, and could actually help alleviate their poverty.

Yes, you read all this right. We tax imported sugar ethanol, which could finance our poor friends, but we don't tax imported crude oil, which definitely finances our rich enemies. We'd rather power anti-Americans with our energy purchases than promote antipoverty.

"It's really stupid," answered Dr. Goldemberg.

If I seem upset about this, I am. Development and environmental experts have long searched for environmentally sustainable ways to alleviate rural poverty — especially for people who live in places like Brazil, where there is a constant temptation to log the Amazon. Sure, ecotourism and rain forest soap are nice, but they never really scale. As a result, rural people in Brazil are always tempted go back to logging or farming sensitive areas.

Ethanol from sugar cane could be a scalable, sustainable alternative — if we are smart and get rid of silly tariffs, and if Brazil is smart and starts thinking right now about how to expand its sugar cane biofuel industry without harming the environment.
US threatened to bomb Pakistan, Musharraf says
September 22, 2006

THE United States threatened to bomb Pakistan "back to the stone age" unless it co-operated with the US-led war on terror after the September 11, 2001 attacks, President Pervez Musharraf has said.

"The intelligence director told me that (Assistant Secretary of State Richard Armitage) said, 'Be prepared to be bombed. Be prepared to go back to the stone age'," Mr Musharraf said in an interview with 60 Minutes, to be shown on Sunday.

Mr Musharraf said the threat came from Mr Armitage and was delivered to the Pakistani president's intelligence director, according to the CBS television network, which produced the report.

The alleged threat also demanded that Pakistan turn over border posts and bases for the US military to use in the war against the Taliban, which ended with the hardline regime's collapse in late 2001.

Other "ludicrous" demands required Pakistan to suppress domestic expressions of support for militant attacks on US targets, according to CBS.

"If somebody's expressing views, we cannot curb the expression of views," Mr Musharraf said.


Read full article at: 
http://www.theaustralian.news.com.au/story/0,20867,20456742-1702,00.html

UN: Human rights worsening in Iraq
Thursday 21 September 2006

Bodies found in the Baghdad morgue "often bear signs of severe torture including acid-induced injuries and burns caused by chemical substances, missing skin, broken bones - back, hands and legs, missing eyes, missing teeth and wounds caused by power drills or nails," the report said.

The monthly report said that terrorist attacks, the growth of militias, the emergence of organized crime had resulted in the large-scale and indiscriminate killing of civilians.

Every month the Iraqi police continue to find hundreds of bodies bearing signs of "severe torture and execution style killing" the report said.
Read full article here: 
http://english.aljazeera.net/NR/exeres/2AE8A2F9-0AE4-4580-ABA1-E2B8AA81C323.htm

Google in bed with U.S. intelligence
By Michael Hampton
February 22, 2006

Even while Google presents a public image of vigorously protecting its users’ privacy, it has quietly provided assistance to several U.S. intelligence agencies, such as the Central Intelligence Agency and Defense Intelligence Agency, as the U.S. prosecutes its war on terrorism. In addition, Google may be providing assistance to the National Security Agency.
http://www.homelandstupidity.us/2006/02/22/google-in-bed-with-us-intelligence/

Sep. 21, 2006 -- President Hugo Chavez calls George W. Bush the devil

As far as we're concerned, Mr. Chavez showed a lot of restraint with his devil comment.  Heck, people call bush way worse than that every five minutes in these parts. 

Admit it, you've wondered if all these republican freaks are ALIENS haven't you?  No one's blaming you, believe me, everybody goes through it sooner or later.  These guys defy reason, and they freak you out and it makes you feel sick inside. They just don't add up. You scrape your mind for answers, you look on line, but the more you find out, the worse it gets.  How could people act like this?  Why would they be this way? They must be Aliens! 

But they're not Aliens, they're not even republicans, and they sure as hell aren't conservatives.  They're liars. They're the extremist of the extremes, and they love war, hate life, and only care about gorging themselves on all the cash in existence. They lie about everything, and are absolutely shameless.  They're dangerous and they're trying hard to run this country into the ground. Nothing is as it should be, and still, no one is stopping them. 

When Mr. Chavez gave this speech at the UN, the audience was with him.  The only people who were unhappy about it were bush himself and his evil administration. Of course bushco went into hiding, they didn't even have the huevos to attend. Well what else did you expect them to do, step up to the plate and face the facts and their accuser like honest men?  What they are cannot be defended which is why they spend so much energy spinning the news and making up scary stories, trying to distract the simple minded sheeple. "Look over here, not over there!  Look here and be afraid!" They'll do anything to avoid having to face real questions and answer to hundreds of millions of angry Americans.  It's MUCH easier to surround themselves with filthy party cooties and tell big lies, and keep cheating like always.  Their control of the news media is the only reason they've been able to get as far as they have.  If we had a free press, they'd have been slammed against the wall 5 years ago, or better yet, be locked behind one.

The fact is, Mr. Chavez was telling it like it is.  (I don't know about the devil part, but the shoe does fit.)  It's a huge relief to finally hear someone stand up and just tell the truth.  What Chavez said is what the vast majority of Americans, and the rest of world say to each other.  I wish it could have been a fine, honest American statesman or woman to stand up like Mr. Chavez did and lay it on the line.  Many have tried.  It's just that the press ignores them.  If a truth is told and nobody hears it, does it exist?  Not in this neo-con controlled nightmare.

Hugo Chavez did us a huge favor.  He also validated a lot of people who thought they were alone in what they saw.  We are not alone folks, not in the wildest stretch of the imagination.  We are in the majority.
The good news is that sugar cane doesn't require irrigation and can't grow in much of the Amazon, because it is too wet. So if the Brazilian sugar industry does realize its plan to grow from 15 million to 25 million acres over the next few years, it need not threaten the Amazon.

However, sugar cane farms are located mostly in south-central Brazil, around São Paulo, and along the northeast coast, on land that was carved out of drier areas of the Atlantic rain forest, which has more different species of plants and animals per acre than the Amazon. Less than 7 percent of the total Atlantic rain forest remains — thanks to sugar, coffee, orange plantations and cattle grazing.

I flew in a helicopter over the region near São Paulo, and what I saw was not pretty: mansions being carved from forested hillsides near the city, rivers that have silted because of logging right down to the banks, and wide swaths of forest that have been cleared and will never return.

"It makes you weep," said Gustavo Fonseca, my traveling companion, a Brazilian and the executive vice president of Conservation International. "What I see here is a totally human dominated system in which most of the biodiversity is gone."

As demand for sugar ethanol rises — and that is a good thing for Brazil and the developing world, said Fonseca, "we have to make sure that the expansion is done in a planned way."

Over the past five years, the Amazon has lost 7,700 square miles a year, most of it for cattle grazing, soybean farming and palm oil. A similar expansion for sugar ethanol could destroy the cerrado, the Brazilian savannah, another incredibly species-rich area, and the best place in Brazil to grow more sugar.

A proposal is floating around the Brazilian government for a major expansion of the sugar industry, far beyond even the industry's plans. No wonder environmental activists are holding a conference in Germany this fall about the impact of biofuels. I could see some groups one day calling for an ethanol boycott — à la genetically modified foods — if they feel biofuels are raping the environment.

We have the tools to resolve these conflicts. We can map the lands that need protection for their biodiversity or the environmental benefits they provide rural communities. But sugar farmers, governments and environmentalists need to sit down early — like now — to identify those lands and commit the money needed to protect them. Otherwise, we will have a fight over every acre, and sugar ethanol will never realize its potential. That would be really, really stupid.

http://mparent7777.livejournal.com/12572437.html

Mr. Chavez knows it and he said so.  I am deeply grateful that the people in other countries, who in the past or present, have gotten the royal shaft from the American government, are able to understand that the American people, at least most of us, are not like bush. Thank God they know that.  We can't stand him either;  we want him behind bars and on trial for war crimes.

In America, freedom of speech has been murdered along with all of those innocent Iraqi civilians.  People are unwilling to speak up, believing Americans have been transformed into Fox News believing ghouls. People are afraid to speak their minds, in fear of these maniacs because we all know what they are.  They are dangerous and they are punitive, and they act outside of the law.  Their propaganda has saturated the country, sliming people with their false assertion that they are beloved and popular.  What a crock!!!  They are despised and reviled and most sane individuals dream of seeing them behind bars for the rest of their lives.

Now their phony terror claims are wearing thin.  An ever growing majority believes they are responsible for 9/11.  People are mad, and they want answers.  They're fed up with the nonsense and stupidity and dirty tricks.  The country is in the worst shape conceivable and no amount of fancy public relations claptrap is going to be able to hide it.  Before 9/11 the world was just the world and all was calm.  No wars, no terror.  It was sane and safe and people laughed and sang songs and enjoyed beautiful weather.  After 9/11, it kept getting worse.  A real leader would have been busy getting things back to normal. He'd have bent over backwards taking care of the first responders of 9/11, and would have called for a full scale investigation of what happened and how. Jobs would have been lost, and charges brought. He'd have told us the truth about everything they found, and would have shared all of the data with us,  and he'd actually go catch the bad guys (if they were real that is). They'd have been tried in a fair court system, with constitutional protections, which are nothing more than fair and reasonable and absolutely necessary if justice is the true goal.  There'd be no talk of torture, no war profiteering, and no war at all for that matter.

A real leader would not have lost the opportunity to lift Americans to a higher calling, inspiring us in ways real leaders can do.  He'd be making us feel safe yet still aware that we can never truly be 100% safe, we can only take reasonable steps and not be lost in hysterical fears, infighting and racism.  Life would go on, and we could smile again, and heal. We could have learned from this tragedy, and become better people.But this liar has kept us in war nonstop. He used our shock and grief to manipulate us into a war that had no just cause.  The evidence is all there, it finally surfaced.  Did he apologize?  No.  To our horror he just changed his 'reasons' for needing to be at war, any war, just so long as there was killing and destruction.

You can read Hugo Chavez' speech in full here.  

(c) 2006 pbsblog.com all rights reserved. (protected by law and invisible alligators).
THIS WEBSITE IS NOT EVEN REMOTELY CONNECTED TO THE
FAMOUS TV NETWORK "PBS". THEY WOULD HATE THIS PLACE.
   


 
Reaching Critical Mass, Hold On Tight
The Front Page ARCHIVES

it's a good place to stuff your head
pbsBlog.com
September 22, 2006

home    movies 1 2 3 4 5  audio     reading     cartoons 
home     

archives main 
TOP OF PAGE
Home   movies:: 1  2  3  4  5   audio   reading   cartoons